Any
act of plagiarism and/ or collusion will be dealt with accordance with
Kingston University’s regulation for Academic Misconduct – Taught Courses
2019/20 (AR6) that can be found using the link URL: https://www.kingston.ac.uk/aboutkingstonuniversity/howtheuniversityworks/policiesandregulations/#ar The
University defines academic misconduct (cheating) in assessment as any
attempt by a student to gain an unfair advantage in assessments or to aid
another to gain such an advantage. Examples of the types of academic
misconduct covered by these procedures are provided below, but this should not
be regarded as a definitive list. The University reserves the right to
include other types of academic misconduct under this procedure (s.8) |
|||
Plagiarism
(including copying) The
University defines plagiarism as the act of presenting the work of another
person (or people) as one’s own without proper acknowledgement. This includes
copying the work of another student or other students. The University expects students to take
responsibility for the security of their work (i.e., with written work, to
ensure that other students do not get access to electronic or hard copy of
the work). Failure to keep work secure may allow others to cheat, and could
result in an allegation of academic misconduct for students whose work have
been copied, particularly if the origin of the work is in doubt |
|||
Self-Plagiarism The
University defines self-plagiarism as the act of presenting part or all of a
student’s work that has been previously submitted to meet the requirements of
a different assessment, except where the nature of the assessment makes this
permissible. |
|||
Collusion The
University defines collusion as the act, by two or more students, of
presenting a piece of work jointly without acknowledging the collaboration.
This could include a student who permits or assists another to present work
that has been copied or paraphrased from the student’s own work. |
|||
Purchasing
or Commissioning The
University defines the act of purchasing or commissioning as either
attempting to purchase or purchasing work for an assessment including, for
example from the internet, or attempting to commission, or commissioning
someone else to complete an assessment. |
|||
|
Marking
Criteria |
|
|
|
Section/element |
Allocated Marks |
|
|
Knowledge
and understanding |
25% |
|
|
Application
of concepts and principles to the task |
25% |
|
|
Critical
analysis |
25% |
|
|
Effectiveness
of communication |
25% |
|
This module introduces students to fundamental organisational functions, the business environment, leadership in organisations and human resource management. Key themes include an understanding of strategic change in organisations, organisational marketing practices, supply chain management, operations management, sustainability and innovative practices in organisations.
Academic Misconduct
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment